This was the form of government for the
District until February 21, 1871. On this date, Congress adopted
a new act for the government of the District; see 16
Stat. 419-429. As seen by a simple review of this
act, it did not create a government for anything but the
District of Columbia, and it certainly did not purport to be a
government for "federal" citizens living in the States. Also
posted here are the first couple of pages from the 1873
Revised Statutes for the District of Columbia.
Scandal was the reason that this form of
government for the District lasted only a mere 7 years. After
the act of February 21, 1871, public officials of the District
incurred tremendous debts for the District, eventually requiring
Congress to in essence step in and take over that government.
See 18
Stat.
(Part
3) 116, ch. 337, for repeal of 1871 act. An act of June
11, 1878, 20 Stat. 102, provided "a permanent form of government
for the District of Columbia." Much later, the District of
Columbia Home Rule Act, Public Law 93-198, 87 Stat. 777,
approved December 24, 1973, created the government for the
District which exists today.
What have the Supremes stated about the "Act of 1871"? In District
of Columbia v. Camden Iron Works, 181 U.S. 453 (1901), the
Supremes held:
"June 20, 1874, an act was passed
entitled 'An Act for the government of the District of
Columbia, and for Other Purposes.' 18 Stat. 116, c. 337. By
this act, the government established by the act of 1871 was
abolished and the President, by and with the advice and
consent of the Senate, was authorized to appoint a Commission,
consisting of three persons, to exercise the power and
authority vested in the governor and the board of public
works, except as afterwards limited by the act.
Those who assert some wild theory about
Washington, D.C. are utterly wrong. They have invented a
"different version" of history without bothering to check out
the facts