Dialogue on Film: Jessica Lange
Source: American Film
Date: 8/1990
It's
not easy for a movie star to stay centered on the craft of
acting. The pressures and prizes of fame, money and power
have a way of killing artistic growth. Much easier to follow
the shining path everyone expects you to take, the one marked
Least Resistance, than the uncertain direction in which your
creative spirit leads. It's this more difficult course that
Jessica Lange has chosen. Following this inner voice has meant
taking some chances that haven't always paid off. But it's
also earned her a well-deserved reputation as one of the best
actresses in Hollywood.
Lange's first film was nearly her last. Few
people were willing to take her seriously after her reprisal
of the Fay Wray role in Dino De Laurentiis' disastrous remake
of King Kong (1976). She was radiant as the angel
of death in All That Jazz (1979), but didn't recover
from the King Kong debacle until 1981, when Bob Rafelson
cast her as the femme who proves fatale to Jack Nicholson
in The Postman Always Rings Twice.
With Postman, Lange blossomed into
an actress of remarkable intensity and craft. From the emotionally
troubled title character in Frances in 1982 to the
lawyer who defends her father against charges of Nazi war
crimes in last year's Music Box, Lange has infused
her performances with a sense of the real and the personal,
picking up four Academy Award nominations and one Oscar (for
Tootsie) along the way.
Her search for challenging roles has sometimes
led her to movies strong on character but deeply flawed in
other ways, like Crimes of the Heart (1986),
Everybody's All-American (1988), and Men Don't Leave
(1989). In many cases, Lange's performance is the only thing
that makes her pictures worth seeing.
In her talk with an overflow crowd of students
at the American Film Institute, Lange stressed the importance
of a character's emotional life.
How did you manage to move from King
Kong to your current status as a respected dramatic actress?
Did you plot your career or did you just hope to get a break
and then do your best?
I think the latter. In the beginning of your
career, you have no control over anything. When I did King
Kong, nobody had any idea that I could act. I always
knew I could. But you can't convince anybody until you're
given the opportunity. You really do have to just wait until
you get a chance to prove it to people. And that came with
Postman, which then led to getting the part in Frances.
And then suddenly, everybody was so stunned. They were so
amazed that I could actually walk and talk.
Watching your characters in different
movies, from Postman to Frances, Tootsie
to Music Box, there's a common thread, an intensity
in what you're doing. Is that something that you look for
in a part or is that Jessica coming out in the character?
It's probably a combination of the two. What
becomes more and more interesting, the longer I work, is what's
left unsaid...the internal life of a character that comes
out in little things like a gesture...the subtleties of acting,
rather than the broad strokes. A lot of that comes from the
preparation. If you have a real life going under the character,
it just pops up here and there. I do look for characters that
are written with some kind of complexity or at least leave
you the opportunity to make something complex out of them.
I like playing different levels at the same time. You know,
its that constant shifting and moving that presents the challenge.
When you get a script. what kind of
preparation do you go through?
Right now, I'm in the middle of this really
excruciating process of trying to get the character right
before I can even begin to prepare (for Blue Sky).
But if the script is ready and the character is what I want
it to be, then I go through a real personal development with
it. I almost always create a history for the character so
that a reference, even it it's just a line or a word, has
a certain resonance in my person when I'm playing the part.
It has to do with imagining. I find more and
more that I think the better the actor, the greater the imagination.
It really is like child's play, more than anything. I see
my own kids when they're playing a game: My daughter, who's
now four, she'll talk and she'll move small objects, and she
becomes so engrossed in the world of her imagination that
the reality is overwhelming. I think that's what an actor
has to do. It really has to do with the power of the imagination
more than anything.
What do you look for in a script?
Usually what makes me decide on a part is that
it presents something that I've never investigated before.
I always look for an emotional arc that exists from the beginning
of the film to the end. What is this character experiencing
emotionally? And that usually is the way I decide. For instance,
when I first got the script for Music Box, it really
wasn't very polished, but I understood immediately the possibilities
of it because of the emotional journey that this woman was
going to have to take.
What has been your worst experience
in filmmaking?
As an actor, you have so little control over
what's finally going to be there on the screen, what people
are going to see and yet, at the same time, you end up taking
almost total responsibility - because you're onscreen and
that's what the audience is looking at. If the film doesn't
work, they assume that it's something that you did wrong as
an actor.
I found that out when I did Everybody’s
All-American. It had been offered to me about four years earlier
at Warner Bros., with Michael Apted directing and Toomy Lee
Jones. And then for one reason or another, Warner Bros. postponed
it...well, they actually just kind of shelved it. I think
a lot of it had to do with an article in American Film magazine
about the 10 greatest unproduced scripts (April 1987). Everybody’s
All-American was one of them, and I thin the article generated
some interest again in the project. The next thing I knew,
I got a call asking if I would still be interested in playing
that part, with Taylor Hackford directing. My immediate response
was no. Then a lot of people called and said, You should think
about this, it’s wonderful. And it was – it was
really a wonderful part. So I reconsidered and decided I would
do it after all.
And then, you know, little by little, they kind
of chipped away at it. I noticed it in the first rewrite:
There was a little less about the character and a little more
about football. And when I saw his first rough cut, I went
absolutely crazy. I wrote long letters, I called. I’d
always get the same response: Yes, yes, I see your point.
It was nothing at all like the movie I had originally wanted
to do. The character was just kind of a caricature. The relationship,
which was the most interesting part of the film for me, tracked
25 years of these two almost stock characters, you know, a
Southern beauty queen and a college football hero, but there
was something so touching about the story as it was written
by Tom Rickman.
That’s the only film that I have been
truly disappointed in. The other films, for better or worse,
they are what they are, but that one is not what it was supposed
to be.
What about your best experience?
Two films were for me just the best experience
in filmmaking. The first one was Postman, working
with Jack Nicholson and Bob. The work was really thrilling,
‘cause it was different from what I had done before.
And Music Box: working with Costa-Gavras was probably
the best experience I’ve ever had as an actress working
with a director because of his amazing sensitivity and kindness
and intelligence. Costas creates a situation that’s
very productive. For the actor, he makes – at least
for me he did – an environment that was very supporting
and very nurturing, which allowed me to really try and experiment.
He also has a certain intuition as to when to stay out of
your way and when to approach you. Words can have such an
impact, they can either move you positively or they can shut
you down and Costas was just amazingly intuitive and intelligent
as when to stay out of the way and when one or two words needed
to be said.
As an actress, what do you think is
the most important function of the director?
To take care of everything that I’m not
taking care of. It’s tricky. Some directors can get
in your way. And what amazes me sometimes is how little film
directors understand the process of acting and how an actor
has to arrive at a place. As soon as a director says to me,
Can you cry on this line? I know we’re out of sync.
We’re not going to be talking about the same thing ever.
There’s this great story: Elia Kazan was directing something
and trying to get this emotion from an actor, and it wasn’t
happening. Finally he went up to the actor – and he
or she was wearing something silk – and Kazan said,
What is that feel of silk? What does that mean to you? It
was something he understood inherently, intuitively, about
how to talk to an actor. For an actor, the only way you can
work is from your senses.
I think Paul Brickman is really a talented filmmaker,
but there was a case where we had virtually no communication
whatsoever. I never knew if he printed one of my takes the
entire time we were shooting Men Don’t Leave
because I never heard him say, That’s good, let’s
print it. Sometimes he’d talk to me, but he’d
talk in such ways that I couldn't even understand. It was
like, What the hell do you want? Just tell me. Ultimately,
you know, we ended up working well together, but it was not
a comfortable situation, for him or for me. But somehow we
ended up making a film where is all gelled.
Do you prefer working with directors who are
very specific about what they’d like or do you prefer
ones who create an atmosphere and then let you work?
The latter, definitely. The only director I’ve
ever worked with who was meticulous to that point was Bobby
Fosse. And it wasn’t just with me, I saw him with everybody
while we were doing All That Jazz. He would actually
give you line readings. He was a genius, and he had such tremendous
talent, that going into it, you just decided you would work
that way for him. I had such a small part in it that it didn’t
really bother me to work that way. The character I played
was really a function of the film more than a full-blown character.
If I were creating a really complete character, then I might
find it difficult to work that way.
When you go into a project, does it
matter who your costars are going to be?
No. The worst part about film is that it is,
in a sense, such a narcissistic art form, ‘cause the
film actor could actually do it alone if he had to. That is
terrible to say, but it’s true. I mean, I had a scene
in Men Don’t Leave that is kind of a pivotal
point for this character. This mother drives over to this
very nice, safe, little house in the middle of the night.
They have to go wake her son up ‘cause she wants to
bring him home. We were shooting at 3:00 in the morning. And
the little boy who was playing the part said that he wanted
to go home. He went home, and they took a little gaffers tape
and made an X on the doorknob, which would be his eyeline,
and I ended up playing the scene to that. A film actor can
get away with that if you have to, because you’re generating
all this stuff inside you. Now, one thing that bothers me
about film acting is that it is always such a private thing.
This actors’ preparing in his trailer and then he walks
out and does his close-ups. You walk out and you’re
off-camera for him but you’re just kind of watching
what he’s doing, and then it turns around and you’re
on-camera. That’s the problem with film acting. It’s
unavoidable, it’s too bad.
Nicholson has a sense of the technical side
of acting better than anyone I’ve ever worked with.
He understands the technical essence of filmmaking, and how
you adapt your work to suit that. And I think that’s
what an actor has to do. I rebelled against that for a while.
But in the end, you have to, at a certain point, play for
the camera. That’s one of the disciplines of film acting.
I think acting in film could be a lot better
if we didn’t always have to deal with the technical
difficulties. I’ve said to directors, You can do all
the tricky camera work, but you’re not gonna have a
film if I don’t deliver this performance. It’s
not going to have any resonance whatsoever unless the actor
is allowed to do what we do.
How important is it to you to intellectualize
the film as a whole, to consider the political or social implications
of this film?
I never think in those terms. I did an interview
for Music Box: This man had just been talking to
Costa and mentioned what Costa had said about the film, about
the essence of evil and historical consciousness, and he said,
Is that what the film is to you? And I said, No. The only
thing I know about this film is that it’s a love story.
It’s about this woman’s devotion and love and
commitment to her family and to her father. I always have
to find the simplest line, the most organic emotional thread.
What about after it’s over? With
a part like Frances, a part that’s really draining?
In the theater, you get to tear down a set and that removes
it, but what do you do the last day? Go home and feed the
kids?
Yeah, there’s definitely a period of adjustment.
It’s getting better for me now, though. I mean, with
something like Frances, that hung around me too long.
I felt real haunted by that character. I truly believe that
when you allow emotions to kind of run wild in you, and especially
emotions like that which are very, very destructive and hurtful,
that tit takes its toll. It affects you physically. Sometimes
you come out of a film and you feel like you’ve got
to start piecing everything back together. The great thing
now for me is my kids, because they create continuity for
me when I’m making a film. When I come home at night,
I’m not allowed the possibility of staying in character.
You’re mom, and you can’t be floating around thinking
about the Holocaust. So that’s great. It helps me a
lot.
You said earlier that when you first
saw the script of Music Box, it wasn’t that
good. Is there such a shortage of good scripts that come to
you that you have to take a good character in the context
of a poor script, as opposed to a script that has it all?
Believe me, Music Box wasn’t
a poor script. I mean, compared to poor scripts, this one
looked like it could’ve been a Pulitzer Prize winner.
On the whole, though, there are not a great many wonderful
parts or wonderful scripts out there. Every once in a while,
you'll get into a little spurt and suddenly, there will be
a lot of wonderful roles. And you kind of back em' up and
lot of them. Then there will be a time when there aren't any,
and you can't find anything that you want to do. Now, it's
funny, 'cause in the last couple of years, there were great
women's roles for a time. Now there are none. And there are
a lot of really great roles for actors, for men. And I don't
know why it works, there's just something, you know, some
kind of cycle of nature or whatever.
In addition to being a very fine actress,
you're also a movie star. Does that also carry baggage in
terms of what roles you're expected to take?
Well, I never make decisions based on that.
But having these tow films come out so close together, Men
Don't Leave and Music Box, puts you in one of
these awful situations where every time you pick up a newspaper
or something, there's a review of your work. I notice a sense
of anger a lot of times: Why does she feel she has to play
these dowdy characters? Why can't we see her in another film
like Tootsie? Why does she feel she has to be dull and drab
to be a good actress? It's amazing to me that people don't
see the point. The point is: why would this Hungarian-American
woman, living in Chicago and working as a lawyer, look like
a movie star?
I always thought of myself as a character actress
because I play characters. I've played people like Patsy Cline
or Frances Farmer, who happened to have moments of glamour.
I'm not narcissistic in that I feel that I have to look great
on film. And I know some actresses do. It doesn't matter to
met if people don't think I look good. What does irk me, though,
is this perception that, because I am who I am, I should look
for parts like the one in Tootsie. The only thing
that matters is my own personal development as an actor. And
I've tried in all my choices to be truthful. And for better
or worse, you know, I think I made good choices.
What are your plans for the future?
I really want to do different things in the
next 10 years. I figure I've got maybe another good five years
in film and then... then the parts are gonna all go to those
other girls - the younger ones. Then I'll make my move to
do more and more theater and less film. I'd also like to try
to direct. And every once in a while, I think, Yeah, I can
do this, 'cause I've been watching it done for a long time.
And then I hear a speech from somebody like Akira Kurosawa...and
I think, Well, maybe not this year.
Close Window
and Return to Media Menu